Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort a person feels when their behavior doesn't align with their values or beliefs. It can also occur when a person holds. It can also happen when a person has two conflicting beliefs at the same time. Because people want to avoid discomfort, cognitive dissonance can have a wide range of effects.
Dissonance can influence the way we act, think and make decisions. We may adopt behaviors or adopt attitudes to help alleviate the discomfort caused by conflict. Problems and mistakes aren't easy to digest. To reduce this cognitive dissonance, we need to modify our self-concept or deny the evidence.
It's often easier to just turn your back on a problem and move on blindly. But the only way to end up being satisfactory is to make an effort to recognize and accept the tests. Making mistakes is human, and until the problem is recognized, solutions will never materialize. To fully accept that something is not going as it should, the easiest way is to focus on the benefits of new approaches and not always judge the causes.
Sometimes we may be afraid of the costs in terms of resources, time, and physical or mental efforts that will eventually entail working to find a solution. We may then need to project ourselves into all the fatalistic consequences that we will eventually encounter if we continue to be sunk in the problem. Sometimes we really need to visualize the disaster before accepting the need for change. Prevention programs based on cognitive dissonance and Internet use have been widely and successfully implemented among female university models, but their use has not yet been extended to the school environment.
Cognitive dissonance theory has had a more illustrious trajectory than its equivalents in political and sociological sciences. Everyone experiences cognitive dissonance to some degree, but that doesn't mean it's always easy to recognize. Cognitive dissonance can even influence how people feel and see themselves, leading to negative feelings of self-esteem and self-esteem. Alternatively, they can reduce cognitive dissonance by being aware of their values and seeking opportunities to live those values.
It is important to note that the theory of cognitive dissonance was conceptualized by Festinger in terms of truth, in terms of establishing what is real. The most effective way to resolve cognitive dissonance is for a person to ensure that their actions are consistent with their values, or vice versa. The term cognitive dissonance is used to describe mental distress that results from having two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. The concept of cognitive dissonance is explained very well in this YouTube video by social psychologist Andy Luttrell.
Cognitive dissonance was measured indirectly by asking participants about changes in their opinion about how pleasant the task was after the experiment. Changing conflicting cognition is one of the most effective ways to address dissonance, but it's also one of the most difficult, especially in the case of deeply held values and beliefs, such as religious or political leanings. More importantly, it also provided the first testable framework for conceptualizing how cognition could be motivated and how motivated cognition could generate some intriguing forms of social behavior. The discrepancy between attitude and behavior (eating a donut while thinking about reducing calorie intake) causes a psychological discomfort called cognitive dissonance (Harmon-Jones, 201).
Cognitive dissonance is not a mental health condition and the person does not necessarily need treatment for it. .
